How to Enhance EFL Students’ English and Persian Argumentative Performance: What Does Explicit Argumentative Teaching Tell Us?

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Alborz, Iran

2 Department of English Language, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The studies on L2 argumentative writing have surveyed different dimensions of learners’ argumentative behavior and performance. However, less attention has been given to the strategies and techniques enhancing students’ argumentative repertoire. As such, the current study, which the design was repeated measures ANOVA, taking a pedagogy-based perspective, examined the argumentative writing behavior, introduced by Toulmin as Toulmin’s model, of 30 Iranian IELTS candidates before, during and after the instruction in both English and Persian languages. The sample questions were of the previous IELTS Writing part 2 essays from a real test by Cambridge University Press, chosen by 3 IELTS instructors in the Institute to meet the research objectives. To this end, 180 IELTS Task 2 argumentative essays were written by 30 volunteers, each having to write 6 essays, at least 250 words, (Persian and English). As for the students’ English and Persian argumentative writing performance, the results indicated that there were significant differences between the EFL learners’ overall means on argumentative tests in both languages. The results demonstrate that a sound pedagogy in argumentation can both influence the use of argumentation elements in both English and Persian written texts. The pedagogical implications for writing instruction and argumentative writing are discussed.

Keywords

References

Abdollahzadeh, E., Amini Farsani, M., & Beikmohammadi, M. (2017). Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL learners. Argumentation, 31, 641-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9415-5
Abu-Bader, S. H. (2021). Using statistical methods in social science research: With a complete SPSS guide. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (1991). Aristotle on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal, 41(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.4.257.
Baker, M. J. (2009). Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge. In N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 127–144). Springer-Verlag.
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge University Press.
Bi, X. (2023). L1 Transfer in Chinese EFL Learners’ Use of Thematic Progression in English Argumentative Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(2), 362-369. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.11
Braund, M., Scholtz, Z., Sadeck, M., & Koopman, R. (2013). First steps in teaching argumentation: A South African study. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(2), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.007
Britt, M. A., Kurby, C. A., Dandotkar, S., & Wolfe, C. R. (2007). I agreed with what? Memory for simple argument claims. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 52-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739166
Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. A. (2003). Constructing representations of arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 794-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00002-0
Coaley, K. (2014). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. SAGE Publications.
Connor, U. (1987). Argumentative patterns in student essays: Cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 57-71). Addison-Wesley.
Connor, U. (2001). Contrastive rhetoric: New directions. [Paper presentation]. The Second International Conference on Contrastive Rhetoric: Linguistics, Culture, and Teaching, The American University in Cairo.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Edelsky, C. (1982). Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of L1 and L2 texts. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586793
Felton, M. K. (2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.001
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2009). What constitutes skilled argumentation and how does it develop? Informal Logic, 29(4), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i4.2905
Govier, T. (2013). A practical study of argument. Cengage Learning.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1989). Writing in a second language: Contrastive rhetoric. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 263-283). Longman.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory & practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Longman.
Graff, G. (2008). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. Yale University Press.
Graff, G., Birkenstein, C., & Maxwell, C. (2014). “They say, I say”: The moves that matter in academic writing. Gildan Audio.
Gray, C. D., & Kinnear, P. R. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 19 made simple. Psychology Press.
Hasani, A. (2016). Enhancing argumentative writing skill through contextual teaching and learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1573-1578. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2806
Hillocks, G. (2011). Teaching argument writing, grades 6–12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning. Heinemann.
Hoey, M., & Winter, E. O. (1983). On the surface of discourse. Allen & Unwin.
Horowitz, D. (1986). Essay examination prompts and the teaching of academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 5(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(86)90019-7
Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08330540
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter‐cultural education. Language Learning, 16(1‐2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 9-21). Addison-Wesley.
Kaplan, R. B. (2001, March 23-25). Telepress conference [Conference presentation]. The Second International Conference on Contrastive Rhetoric: Linguistics, Culture, and Teaching, The American University in Cairo.
Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.004
Kuhn, D. (2008). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605.
Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. A. (2009). Improving students’ evaluation of informal arguments. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
Leitão, S. (2003). Evaluating and selecting counterarguments: Studies of children’s rhetorical awareness. Written Communication, 20(3), 269-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303257507
Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written Communication, 19(1), 109-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108830201900105
McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
Mitchell, S., Prior, P., Bilbro, R., Peake, K., See, B., & Andrews, R. (2008). A reflexive approach to interview data in an investigation of argument. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270802416911
Mu, C. (2005). A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies. In Redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practice (pp. 1-10). National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Nurhayati, H. (2018). Wisdom values in traditional phrases the Mamuju tribe in shaping this study entitled local the character of society: Antrpolinguistics approach. Astra Salvensis, 6(Sup. 1), 207-319.
O’Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 22(1), 209-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1999.11678963
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
Rashtchi, M., Porkar, R., & Ghazi Mir Saeed, F. (2019). Product-Based, Process-Based, and Genre-Based Instructions in Expository Writing: Focusing on EFL Learners’ Performance and Strategy Use. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(6), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3445511
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge.
Rowe, G., Macagno, F., Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2006). Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy. Teaching Philosophy, 29(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200629222
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00028-X(00
Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. McGraw-Hill.
Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication, 21(2), 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262846
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90016-5(98
Voss, J. F., Fincher-Kiefer, R., Wiley, J., & Silfies, L. N. (1993). On the processing of arguments. Argumentation, 7, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710663
Walton, D. N. (1989). Informal logic: A handbook for critical argument. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00084-X
Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.004
Wilder, L. (2005). “The rhetoric of literary criticism” revisited: Mistaken critics, complex contexts, and social justice. Written Communication, 22(1), 76-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088304272745
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309333019.
Yang, L. F., & Wang, W. B. (2017). A study of the transfer of coherence features by Chinese secondary EFL learners: From the perspective of the difference between English temporality and Chinese spatiality. Zhong guo wai yu, 14(1), 68-76.
Yeh, S. S. T. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle school students [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University].
Zembal‐Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20325
Zohar, A. (2007). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 245-268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_12.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 23 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 14 August 2023
  • First Publish Date: 14 August 2023
  • Publish Date: 05 March 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics