High School Students’ Perceptions of Learning English Online: Satisfaction, Perceived Learning, and Challenges

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. candidate, English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

Given the significance of online learning, various factors influencing students' satisfaction and perceived learning have been explored by researchers. However, online learning for Iranian public high schools has never been held until recently due to the Coronavirus outbreak. Accordingly, the present study aims at investigating EFL learners' perceptions of English online learning classes using a semi-structured interview. The participants of this study were 15 female high school students, within the age range of 16-18, who had been recently taught Vision Series for their required English course online. In order to analyze the data, a hybrid process of inductive and deductive thematic analysis was conducted. In the deductive phase of analysis, a model of students' satisfaction and perceived learning was utilized, and new themes, in the inductive phase, emerged from the data. The analysis of the data revealed that the students were satisfied with online learning through exercising self-efficacy, learner-content interaction, and learner-instructor interaction. Moreover, the students believed that the course resulted in optimal learning of the materials presented to them; however, they confronted some challenges including Internet access, software requirements, and engagement problems. The findings of the present study will be of interest to teachers and those in charge of holding online classes to employ strategies to improve the effectiveness of online classes.

Keywords

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2014). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
Alavi, M., Markas, G. M., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.4.404.72
Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Artino, A. R. (2007). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x.
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Burger, J. M. (2019). Personality (10th ed.). Cengage.
Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2013). Listening strategy use and influential factors in web-based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12041
Chen, Y. J., & Chen, P. C. (2007). Effects of online interaction on adult students’ satisfaction and learning. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 3(2), 78-89.
Cho, M. H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001
Cigdem, H., & Yildirim, O. (2014). Effects of students’ characteristics on online learning readiness: A vocational college example. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.69439
Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319
Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2017). Online interaction quality among adult learners: The role of sense of belonging and perceived learning benefits. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 71-78.
Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
Eneau, J., & Develotte, C. (2012). Working together online to enhance learner autonomy: Analysis of learners’ perceptions of their online learning experience. ReCALL, 24(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000267
Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analyzing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2019). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Online Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1899
Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte. M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic Press.
Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Osodel, J. V. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609-617.
Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K., & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2010.522919
Hamdan, K. M., Al-Bashaireh, A. M., Zahran, Z., Al-Daghestani, A., AL-Habashneh, S. & Shaheen, A. M. (2021). University students’ interaction, Internet self-efficacy, self-regulation and satisfaction with online education during pandemic crises of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0513
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004.
Jan, S. K. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy, computer self-efficacy, prior experience, and satisfaction with online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.994366
Jiang, H., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., & Spector, J. M. (2021). Online learning satisfaction in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional comparison between Eastern and Western Chinese universities. Education & Information Technologies, 26(6), 6747-6769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10519-x
Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317-338.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2021). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592
Liang, R., & Chen, D. T. V. (2012). Online learning: Trends, potential and challenges. Creative Education, 3(8), 1332-1335. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38195
Mackey, A., & Gass S. M. (2016). Second language research methodology and design. Routledge.
Mahle, M. (2011). Effects of interactivity on student achievement and motivation in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 207-215.
Meredith, J. (2019). Conversation analysis and online interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
Ozturk, H. T., & Ozcinar, H. (2013). Learning in multiple communities from the perspective of knowledge capital. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1418.
Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511.
Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217.
Poynter, R. (2010). The handbook of online and social media research. Willey.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J., Whighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). 18-35. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2203
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
Sebastianelli, R., Swift, C., & Tamimi, N. (2015). Factors affecting perceived learning, satisfaction, and quality in the online MBA: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Education for Business, 90(6), 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1038979.
Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102-120.
Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M-L., Fisseler, B., & Sturmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 56, 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x
Sun, S. Y. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891428.
Tang, Y., & Tseng, H. W. (2013). Distance learners’ self-efficacy and information literacy skills. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 517-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.008
Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649409526852.
Wei, H. C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: Do perceptions and readiness matter? Distance Education, 41(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2016). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926312
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012.
Yukselturk, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51-65.
Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1302.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 November 2023
  • Revise Date: 19 November 2023
  • Accept Date: 24 December 2023
  • First Publish Date: 24 December 2023
  • Publish Date: 28 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics