Incorporation of Discourse Coherence Strategies into Writing Skills Instruction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor in Applied Linguistics Imam Ali University, Faculty of Basic Sciences, English Language Dept. Tehran, Iran

2 MA in English Language Teaching, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Discourse, as an object being studied nowadays in many disciplines of humanities and social sciences, plays a special role in applied linguistics, in both theory and practice. It is characterized mainly by cohesion and coherence; the former is created by some cohesive devices while the latter is established using certain strategies rarely incorporated into and investigated in language skills development. Therefore, this study is concerned with investigating the effect of discourse coherence strategies incorporated into writing instruction on developing writing skills. To this end, 50 Iranian female EFL learners assigned in 5 groups (4 experimental, 1 control) were exposed to four coherence-based strategies, including 1) Given/New Strategy (GNS), 2) Direct Matching Strategy (DMS), 3) Bridging Strategy (BRS), 4) Reinstating Old Information Strategy (ROIS), 5) Control group conventional instructions of writing skills, respectively.  Results of the One-Way ANOVA statistical analysis revealed that using discourse coherence-based strategies in the classroom, compared to mainstream instruction, can more significantly enhance the writing ability of EFL learners. Comparatively, the Give and New strategy-based instruction proved to be most effective in developing the target skill. However, cross-strategically, no significant difference was seen among the investigated discourse coherence-based strategies. The findings offer pedagogical implications for L2 practitioners, teachers, materials developers, and autonomy-seeking learners. They also provide further research insights into teaching writing besides all other language skills.

Keywords

References

Abbasian, G., Birjandi, P., & Mirhassani, A. (2006). Setting-based metacognitive strategy use. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 49(198), 39-87.
Abbasian, G. & Nalkoubi, S. (2018). Incorporation of discourse coherence strategies in reading instruction [Unpublished master’s thesis]. IAU, South Tehran Branch.
Carroll, D. (2008). Psychology of language. Nelson Education.
Cekiso, M., Tshotsho, B., & Somniso, M. (2016). Exploring first-year university students’ challenges with coherence writing strategies in essay writing in a South African university. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890431
Celce-Murcia, M. (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.). Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Charoento, M. (2017). Individual learner differences and language learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 7(2), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v7i2.875.
Coertze, N. (2018). The development of discourse coherence devices of different language typologies: South African English and isiZulu [Doctoral dissertation]. North-West University.
Curran, C. E., Kintsch, E., & Hedberg, N. (1996). Learning-disabled adolescents’ comprehension of naturalistic narratives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.494.
Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. SIU Press.
Fletcher, S. J. (1994). Splendid ideas for Spanish teachers. Oxford University Press.
Greenfield, P. M., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2003). Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 713-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.005.
Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423513.
Khabiri, M., & Hajimaghsoodi, A. (2012). The effect of discourse analysis-based instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. American Journal of Scientific Research, 66, 23-36.
Leo, K. (2012). Investigating cohesion and coherence discourse strategies of Chinese students with varied lengths of residence in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 29, 157-179. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i0.1115
Liu, L., & Qi, X. (2010). A contrastive study of textual cohesion and coherence errors in Chinese EFL abstract writing in engineering discourse. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(3), 176-187.
Meurer, J. L. (2003). Relationships between cohesion and coherence in essays and narratives. Fragmentos: Revista de Língua e Literatura Estrangeiras, 25, 147-154.
Naiman, N., Frohlich, H., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nasihah, M., & Cahyono, B. (2017). Language learning strategies, motivation, and writing achievement of Indonesian EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.18.
Olshtain, E. (2001). Functional tasks for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 207-217). Heinle & Heinle.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.012
Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumption, research, history, and typology. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Prentice-Hall.
Rubin, J. (2013). Teaching language-learning strategies. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-5). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1165.
Shaw, P., & McMillion, A. (2008). Proficiency effects and compensation in advanced second-language reading. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 123-143.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304.
Traxler, M. J. (2011). Introduction to psycholinguistics: Understanding language science. Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Watanabe, S. (2003). Cohesion and coherence strategies in paragraph‐length and extended discourse in Japanese oral proficiency interviews. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 555-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02146.x
Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice-Hall.
Wu, Y. (2013). Conversation analysis–A discourse approach to teaching oral English skills. International Education Studies, 6(5), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n5p87
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 01 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 01 November 2023
  • First Publish Date: 01 November 2023
  • Publish Date: 01 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics