TTC for TEYL: From Assumed Competence to Observed Performance

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor,English Department, Mazandaran University of Science and Technology, Iran

2 English Department, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Abstract

The present study aimed to educate a group of young teachers through a TTC for TEYL while evaluating their assumed competence and observed performance. Fifteen student teachers participated in a 5-session online course and maintained their involvement through offline group discussions between weekly sessions. After the course, they were given a 25-item questionnaire to express their subjective assessment in regard with the effect of the TTC on their teaching competence, and were also required to develop multimedia TEYL materials reflecting their actual grasp of the presented content. A chi square test showed that the answers given to 11 items of the questionnaire across five dimensions of TEYL namely motivation, mediation, maturation, manipulation and modulation produced significant coefficient reflecting the teachers' perception of their abilities. In addition, two independent raters scored their performance on the task. The assumed competence and the observed performance were quantified and analyzed in a linear regression model to see if the former can predict the latter. Moreover, the individual and collective reactions of the student teachers both to the contents of the online course and issues raised in the offline discussions were examined via educational discourse analysis. The findings set the ground for designing and assessing future TTC courses in TEYL.

Keywords

References

Ahmad, N., & Samad, A. (2018). Metaphors as proxies for identity: A case study of a teaching English to young learners (TEYL) teacher. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(4), 143-157.
Aukrust, V. (2007). Young children acquiring second language vocabulary in preschool group-time: Does amount, diversity, and discourse complexity of teacher talk matter? Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 17-36.
Cameron, L. (2003). Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. ELT  Journal, 57(2), 105-112.
Camlibel-Acar, Z. (2017). Pre-service teachers' perceived readiness and willingness to teach English to young learners. Studia Anglica 226(7), 21-30.
Cao. P. (2019). Teaching English to young learners in Vietnam: From policy to implementation. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 6(1), 96-104.
Chujo, K., & Nishigaki, C. (2004). Creating E-learning material to teach essential vocabulary for young EFL learners. IWLeL: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-learning, 35-44.
Chujo, K., Oghigain, K., Uchiyama, M., and Nishigaki, C. (2011). Creating corpus-based daily life vocabulary for TEYL. Asian EFL Journal, 54, 30-58.
Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 738-762.
Dorsah, P. (2021).  Pre-service teachers’ readiness for emergency remote learning in the wake of covid-19. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-12.
Graham, S., Courtney, L., Marinis, T., & Tonkyn, A. (2017). Early Language Learning: The impact of teaching and teacher factors. Language Learning 67(4), 922-958.
Hirata, E. (2016). The development of multi-modal corpus tool for teaching English to young learners.  Fukuoka Jo Gakuin University Bulletin, 2, 19-32.
Hussein, R. (2014). A profile of exemplary teachers of English for young learners at the elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 2(4), 311-321.
Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(3):389-420.
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.
Pejović, I. (2013). Cultural pluralism, multiculturalism and intercultural awareness in Teyl: The eyes of the same color. In V. Savić and I. Ćirković-Miladinović (Eds.),  Integrating culture and language teaching in TEYL, conference proceedings No. 16 (pp. 19-26). Jagodina: City Press.
Pim, C. (2013). “Emerging technologies, emerging Minds: Digital innovations within the primary sector” in G. Motteram (ed), Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching (15-42). London: The British Council.
Ratminingsihm, N., Mahadewi, L., & Divayana, D. (2018). ICT-Based Interactive Game in TEYL: Teachers’ Perception, Students’ Motivation, and Achievement. International Journal of English Teaching, 13(9), 190-203.
Rich, S. (2014). Taking stock: Where are we now with TEYL? In S. Rich (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching English to young learners (pp. 1-22). UK: Palgrave.
Sad, S. (2015). Do prospective classroom teachers perceive themselves as effective and willing to teach young learners of English? Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), 1257-1269.
Strakova, Z. (2015). The Perception of readiness for teaching profession: A case of pre-service trainees. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 3(1), 32-42.
Szpotowicz, M. (2009). Factors influencing young learnersʼ vocabulary acquisition. In. M. Nikolov. (ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes (pp. 195-211). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Unsworth, S. Persson, L., Prins, T. & De Bot, K. (2015). An investing of factors affecting early foreign language learning in Netherlands. Applied linguistics, 36, 527-548.
Wissink, B., & Starks, S. (2019). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach English language learners. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(10), 349-357.
Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology: Active learning edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching
Volume 01, Issue 1
January 2023
Pages 163-174

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics